Adv. Amrita Narayan

Amrita Narayan is a Partner at HSA Advocates with over 22 years of legal experience. She practises dispute resolution, corporate and commercial litigation, arbitration, and regulatory matters. She regularly appears before the Supreme Court, High Courts, and key tribunals including NGT, APTEL, TDSAT, CAT, and NCDRC.

A Plaint Can Be Amended After Trial Begins When a Previously Unknown Compromise Decree Is Discovered: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Amendment to Property Suit, Sets Aside Orissa High Court Order; Imposes ₹25,000 Costs The Supreme Court of India has allowed the legal...

Absconding Accused Cannot Benefit From Witness’s Death: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has ruled that the testimony of a deceased witness recorded during the trial of co-accused can be relied upon against an...

Keep exploring

Dowry Is Not Tradition, It Is Crime: Supreme Court’s Powerful Message

The Supreme Court of India’s judgment in State of Uttar Pradesh v. Ajmal Beg & Anr. stands as a powerful reaffirmation of the law...

Courts Are Not Railway Regulators, Gauhati High Court On Kavach PIL

Judicial restraint took centre stage as the Gauhati High Court Kavach PIL questioning railway safety systems, punctuality, and passenger amenities was dismissed for lacking...

Latest articles

A Plaint Can Be Amended After Trial Begins When a Previously Unknown Compromise Decree Is Discovered: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Amendment to Property Suit, Sets Aside Orissa High Court Order; Imposes ₹25,000 Costs The Supreme Court of India has allowed the legal...

Absconding Accused Cannot Benefit From Witness’s Death: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has ruled that the testimony of a deceased witness recorded during the trial of co-accused can be relied upon against an...

Threatening Words During Quarrel Do Not Automatically Amount to Criminal Intimidation: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has ruled that abusive or vulgar language, by itself, does not amount to "obscenity" under Section 294(b) of the Indian Penal...

Supreme Court To Consider Plea Seeking Recognition of PSU Law Officers’ Experience for 3-Year Judicial Service Practice Requirement

The Supreme Court has agreed to examine whether legal experience gained by law officers serving in government departments and public sector undertakings (PSUs) should...